The term "Karen" is pretty much a universal insult for self-entitled women these days, but has a male counterpart been decided upon yet?

There have been an increasing number of tales of "Karens" floating around the web, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. If you're unfamiliar with the time period, well, first: Where have you been? And second, here is a definition:
Wikipedia has a lovely just right one pegged down for this lately developed slang time period: "Karen is a pejorative term for a person perceived to be entitled or demanding beyond the scope of what is considered appropriate or necessary."
But what's a male version called?
Article continues underneath commercial
Is "Ken" an appropriate term for the male version of a Karen?
The identify "Ken" got here up in some other recent viral tale the place two white people called the law enforcement officials on an Asian-American doctor, Khoa Lam, who used to be just visiting his folks in a housing complicated. Lam had recorded the whole come across because he sensed a "Karen on the loose" after he was accosted by means of the girl. Shortly after, he used to be approached by way of a man who was once on the phone with the police. Lam called the guy a "Ken" for his movements.
Then there was once that St. Louis legal professional couple, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who stood outside of their home, brandishing weapons to protect it from protesters they feared would assault their home.
A now viral image of the two quickly changed into the talk of the web, and countless memes have been created of the duo, lampooning them as Grand Theft Auto loading displays, film posters, and, of direction, dubbing them a "Ken & Karen" couple.
Article continues under advertisement
Article continues under advertisement
But is that what the male version of a Karen truly is?
While it kind of feels like the "Ken" moniker is no doubt sticking for a lot of people, there are a quantity of other people on the web who have their very own concepts. Not everybody appears to be in overall agreement, which has turn into abundantly clear from this fresh Reddit submit that tackles this crucial sociological factor.
Article continues underneath commercial
User The1_BlueX turns out to think that "Frank" is the right time period. Personally, I don't think that it suits and there may well be some non-public bias here, but some of their good judgment is indexed below:
"Frank is a man and everyone needs to know it. You will often see him driving his blacked out Silverado around town just begging for people to pay attention to it. Sometimes he pulls a boat with it but mostly he just drives it to work so that he can impress the guys, who secretly can't stand him."
Article continues below advertisement
"Frank is the guy who has to talk so loud you can hear from the other side of a Texas Roadhouse. He also tries to get flirty with the waitresses despite his entire family sitting there with him. He watches football religiously. Alabama is his favorite team, even though he only drove through Alabama once to go to Florida one summer. He constantly complains about millennials."
Article continues beneath advertisement
However, there were several people who believe that the male version of a Karen is, no doubt, a "Richard." And they've offered up some pretty compelling the reason why. Like __Miguel_'s description underneath:
"Stoner deadbeat dad. Wears white wifebeaters, loose baggy jeans at least halfway down their ass, a cap with the visor facing any other direction than forwards, and sunglasses, exclusively and regardless of setting, including indoors."
"Unlike Karen, however, Richard (because Dick seems an appropriate "puppy name" for the male Karen) would be unable to care less for their children if he actively tried to, meaning when Karen eventually takes the kids, Richard will feel relieved. Or he would, if he came down from his high long enough to even notice that 1) Karen was gone, 2) the kids were gone, and 3) he had kids in the first place."
Article continues beneath commercial
I believe that the male version of a “Karen” must be a “Jeremy.”
Anyone object—besides Jeremy?#KarenStrikesAgain
— JΛKΣ (@USMCLiberal) June 17, 2020 Source: TwitterHey Chad — can I call you Chad? — let’s discuss your definition of “beneath siege”. Your danger review seems a bit overexaggerated (1/2).... https://t.co/NwAeIrCBOg
— Daniel W. Drezner (@dandrezner) July 17, 2020 Source: TwitterArticle continues beneath commercial
But then there are other folks who swear that it's Chad, or Brad, Brian, or Jeremy, or Karlos (not sure if I'm conversant in that spelling).
However, it kind of feels that more and more people are honing in on Ken. I think that this tweet beneath makes a succinct, however infallible case.
Folks, a hill I'm prepared to die on: the male version of a Karen is unquestionably “Ken”. Brad/Chad simply need to let you know about a nice strategy to earn passive income, NOT communicate in your supervisor
— Connor (@cflynnmusic) July 18, 2020 Source: TwitterI imply, it is in point of fact difficult to argue with this logic. Seems lovely sound in case you ask me.
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pbXSramam6Ses7p6wqikaKhfrLWiwIyiqmaZXaKurbGMr5yrq5mku267xWaimqqVo3qkrculnJ0%3D